many books come out nowadays that it's very easy for even really good books to get lost.
Or is it because it centres on Scotland, and hasn't made it south of the border? I hope this isn't the case. I don't see why it should be, but I suppose it's possible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9b2d/f9b2deaf65aff58b074785d3e6ebb92fe456559d" alt=""
I only knew the bare bones of this part of Scottish history before I read this book. But I have been to Culloden. I'm not normally, I think, particularly sensitive to the atmosphere which some people sense in places; I've never felt the presence of ghosts, let alone seen one. But Culloden is a desolate place, with a brooding sense of melancholy. How could it be otherwise, when so many were brutally slaughtered here, and so many hopes died?
This book explains what led up to the battle. But it also reveals a society where women were at least the equal of men, and where a culture had been created which ensured that everyone within a community was cared for: the clan chief was responsible for his people and cared for them; he held the land for the good of all, not on his own behalf. After Culloden, all that was changed.
So - the book is a terrific, page-turning read. The characters are complex, larger than life perhaps, but immensely attractive. There's a lot of humour in it. The battle scenes are horrific, but all the more convincing for that. There's quite a lot of rompery between the sheets - which Janet Paisley writes about so much better than Ken Follett. (See review of the latter here.)
But above and beyond all this, the book makes you think about a different sort of society that might once have been possible - and about all that was crushed and lost at and after Culloden. And it makes you understand a bit better why many Scots feel as they do about nationalism.
The book is published by Penguin.
This was Scottish Book of the Year in 2007. Possibly the reason it was not known to you is that when I read what you've said about it, my immediate reaction was Braveheart got there first. And Braveheart, in my opinion, is about as deep as the average English reader would want to know about Scottish clans. So an unlikely presence in the local Waterstones ?
ReplyDeleteOf course, if they had known about the rompery....
Andrew Mclellan Preston
ReplyDeleteWas Braveheart a book before it was a film? I don't know. A big difference between this and Braveheart is the status of the women characters; in the film, as far as I remember, they were very much victims, or there to be loved and left. In this book, the women fight as hard as the men, and are at the very least their equals. Thanks for telling me that it was the Book of the Year - and congratulations on a fine Scottish name!
ReplyDeleteThank you, very kind of you to say so.
ReplyDelete